Great advancements in evangelical mission activity have taken place over the past sixty years. Moving from the mission-station model, we entered into a new paradigm–a paradigm in which we presently reside. However, paradigms have lifespans. As I have written before, the thinking and practices of today will not sustain healthy Kingdom practices later today.
We are in a liminal state, moving from our present paradigm into a future one that remains unclear. Consider a few published resources over the past few years. David Hesselgrave’s Paradigms in Conflict (which was expanded and updated as a second edition in 2018), my Pressure Points, and Pocock, Van Rheenen, and McConnell’s The Changing Face of World Missions address some of the pressing issues missionaries are facing. Paul Borthwick’s Western Christians in Global Mission attempts to answer the question about the role of the West in Kingdom advancement. Denny Spitters and Matthew Ellison recently reminded us of the dangers of missions-as-everything in their work When Everything is Missions. In a book that should have received much more attention than it has, Alan R. Johnson calls for a paradigm shift in Apostolic Function, I do the same in Apostolic Church Planting, and Alan Hirsch does so in several of his books. Michael W. Stroope calls for a change in our mission language in Transcending Mission: The Eclipse of a Modern Tradition. And with 40 years of progress going to the unreached peoples, R. W. Lewis reminds us of the remaining task in her article, “Clarifying the Remaining Frontier Mission Task.”
Change is needed.
This post begins a series regarding my thinking on a way forward as we wait our Lord’s return. As Kingdom stewards, we must apply aggressive evaluation to our methods and strategies in light of God’s Word and His world. The Mercury Project will not land us on the moon but is necessary to get us there. By God’s grace, I am very thankful for the progress that has been made among the nations, but it is time for transition. Paradigms lead to progress, but are not eternal.
Here are some of the topics I plan to address when it comes to missions today:
Re-Thinking Language
Re-Thinking Purpose
Re-Thinking Function
Re-Thinking Identity
Re-Thinking Location
Re-Thinking Strategy
Re-Thinking Partnerships
Re-Thinking the West
Re-Thinking Sending/Support Structures
I have intentionally chosen the concept of “re-thinking” for it clearly communicates my starting point. I realize such language will cause some of you to remember William Hocking’s (1932) work Re-Thinking Missions: A Layman’s Inquiry after One Hundred Years that called for the reduced role of Western workers and the neglect of evangelism and disciple making. However, I assure you that such a thesis is far from my perspective. In fact, I will strongly emphasize a greater involvement of the West and increased evangelism and church multiplication activities.
Share with others and stay tuned.
Pingback: Apostolic Imagination: Rethinking the Language of Mission | Missiologically Thinking
Pingback: Apostolic Imagination: Rethinking Purpose and Mission | Missiologically Thinking
This is an important conversation to be having and somehow it needs to sift down to the local church level. The majority of churches I’m working with as a mobilizer continue to not recognize the tremendous changes that have been brought about by technology, globalization and the tremendous growth of the church in the global south. It is an entirely different paradigm with new, exciting and different opportunities for gospel proclamation. And the whole church can be involved. Are you finding any good examples of churches stepping into these opportunities in new and innovative ways?
One project In working in in the rural Midwest is Embassy teams (www.thisisembassy.com). Teams in local churches building relationships with Muslims in closed countries who are looking for English conversation partners. Its been exciting to see folks in rural Iowa and South Dakota having gospel conversations with people in the 10/40 window.
Aaron, take a look at the churches in the US that are connected to the No Place Left Movement.
Pingback: Apostolic Imagination: Rethinking Function | Missiologically Thinking
Pingback: Rethinking Identity in Mission | Missiologically Thinking
Pingback: Apostolic Imagination: Rethinking Location – Missiologically Thinking
Pingback: Apostolic Imagination: Rethinking the Language of Mission - Wheaton College Billy Graham Center
Pingback: Apostolic Imagination: Rethinking the Language of Mission – Wheaton Billy Graham